|
|
|
Mullus barbatus (Linnaeus, 1758) |
 |
|
|
|
|
Class: |
Actinopterygii |
|
Order: |
Perciformes |
|
Family: |
Mullidae |
|
English name: |
Red mullet |
|
|
|
|
Local Name: |
|
SQ: |
Barbuni |
|
HR: |
Trlja od blata |
|
IT: |
Triglia di fango |
|
SR: |
Barbun, Trlja od blata |
|
SL: |
Bradač |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
The body of Red mullet is long strong, and
laterally slightly flat. The head is relatively short; the snout is short as
well, with a steep anterior profile. The eyes are positioned near the top of the
head. The mouth is small, positioned low on the head. There are two barbels
under the mouth aperture. They have a sensory function and are used in searching
for prey. The colour is uniformly pink, the back is darker and the belly is
white. The fins are without any well-defined coloration (Tortonese,
1975; Fisher et al.,
1987; Jardas,
1996; Relini et al., 1999).
Morphology data:
The number of rays in the fins is the following: D1:VII-VIII, D2: I+7-8, A:
II+6-7, P: 15-17, V: I+5 (Jardas,
1996). |
|
 |
|
World:
The red mullet is distributed in the eastern Atlantic - from the
North Sea and England to Senegal and in the Mediterranean.
Adriatic Sea:
It is uniformly distributed in all parts of the Adriatic (Jardas,
1996).
Habitat:
This is a benthic species, found mostly on muddy bottoms in depth
range of 5 to 250 m (Relini et al., 1999). It prefers the more shallow
waters of the northern and central Adriatic, i.e. depths above 100 m, while only
few specimens may be caught in deeper waters (Jukić and
Piccinetti,
1981).
Although the species is widely distributed,
the relative index of the population abundance decreases with depth (Haidar,
1970; Jukić,
1972; Jukić and Arneri, 1984; Županović and Jardas, 1989; Jukić et al.,
1999;
Vrgoč, 2000).
Seasonal migration:
Spring:
During the spring, red mullet is found mostly along the eastern
coast, on sandy bottoms.
Autumn:
In autumn Red mullet is found on the entire Adriatic Sea shelf (Arneri
and Jukić, 1986).
Migration (inshore/offshore behaviour):
Haidar (1970) showed that in the
central and northern Adriatic, there are two migration types in this species:
the migration of the young fish from the coast towards the open sea and the
spring migration of adult spawning fish towards channels region along the
Croatian coast at depths between 50 and 85 meters. Other authors found similar
inshore-offshore behaviour (Scaccini, 1947a;
Županović,
1963; Jardas,
1996).
Depth:
Jukić and
Piccinetti (1981) found that adult specimens did not migrate significantly during the year and
migrations were limited to 100 m isobath. Županović and Jardas
(1989), however,
did not notice significant migrations in the Pomo/Jabuka Pit region. So, it
seems that the area is primarily inhabited by adult specimens in the second year
of their life (Županović,
1963). Generally, the population abundance decreases
with depth (Haidar 1970; Jukić,
1972; Merker and Ninčić, 1973; Jukić,
1975; Županović and Jardas, 1989;
Vrgoč, 2000).
Bottom preferences:
Regarding the type of sediment, Županović and Jardas
(1989) found in the Pomo/Jabuka Pit region that the abundance of this species
was higher at stations with a rugged type of sediment, which, at the same time,
correlates with the shallower areas. Jukić and
Piccinetti (1981) pointed out
that red mullet prefer muddy and sandy bottoms, e.g. the regions with the
highest availability of its food. |
|
 |
|
Size:
According to Jardas (1996), red mullet grow up to about 30 cm (about 0,5 kg).
The usual total length in catches is 10 to 20 cm. On average, females have
greater body length than males (Jardas,
1996). They also grow faster, which can
be already noticed in the first year of their life (Haidar
1970). Therefore,
almost all the bigger specimens are females (28 to 29 cm). Males do not grow
more than about 20 cm (Relini et al., 1999).
Length-weight relationship:
The length-weight relationship shows that the growth of this species is
isometric (Table 8) There are two different inflexion points in the
length-weight relationship of females, one at 12-13 cm (corresponding to the
first sexual maturity) and the other one between 16 and 17 cm. There is only one
male inflexion point, between 11,5 and 12 cm and it corresponds to the length at
first sexual maturity (Županović and Jardas, 1989).
Total Length (TL, cm) – weight (g)
relationship.
Spawning:
According to all the authors, Red mullet spawns in the Adriatic Sea in late
spring and summer (May, June, July). According to
Haidar (1970), males have two
types of sexual cycle: specimens smaller than 14 cm (three years according to
this author) have annual sexual cycles, with the spawning phase from May to July,
whereas bigger specimens have biennial sex cycle with the reproductive phase
from May to December. Females always have an annual reproduction cycle and they
spawn from April to May. Red mullet reach sexual maturity in the first year of
life at lengths between 10 and 14 cm (Table 9). The most intensive spawning
occurs at depths of 60 to 70 m. After the spawning, post larvae move towards
shallower water (30-40 m) and coast (Županović and Jardas, 1989). Larvae, post
larvae and juveniles up to 4-5 cm of total length are pelagic. Afterwards,
individuals move towards sandy coastal areas and become demersal. They
concentrate particularly near river mouths and sometimes enter rivers for
several hundreds of meters (Scaccini, 1947a). Later, they start their dispersion
towards sandy, muddy and gravel grounds at depths between 10 and 250 m (Relini et al., 1999). A high density of larvae was found in the Central Adriatic at 50
to 100 m depth (Guescini et al.,
1983). The sex ratio is extremely variable,
depending on the different zones studied. Županović
(1963) demonstrated, through
analysis of the literature, that in the eastern Mediterranean, including the
Adriatic Sea, females predominate while an inverse situation is observed in the
Western Mediterranean.
Sex Ratio:
In the Pomo/Jabuka Pit region, males are dominant at lengths up to 17 cm, while
females dominate at greater lengths, most probably because of different growth
rates of males and females (Županović and Jardas, 1989). This was confirmed by
Vrgoč (2000) in the central and northern Adriatic, during the MEDITS expedition
it was found that males were dominant in the population up to 14 to 15 cm; above
15 cm, females were dominant. In Montenegrin water the sex ratio is: M : F =
37% : 63% (Joksimovic, 2005).
Length at the first sexual maturity:
Total Length (Lm,
cm) at the first sexual maturity.
|
Author |
Sex |
(Lm, cm) |
Age (yr) |
|
Zei and Sabioncello, 1940 |
M+F |
11-14 |
1 |
|
Scaccini, 1947a |
M+F |
|
2 |
|
Županović,
1963 |
M |
11-12 |
|
|
F |
12-13 |
|
|
Haidar,
1970 |
M |
10.5 |
1 |
|
F |
12 |
1 |
|
Jukić and
Piccinetti,
1981 |
M |
10.5 |
1 |
|
Marano et al., 1998b
Marano et al., 1998c |
M + F |
11-14 |
|
|
Relini et al., 1999 |
M |
11-13 |
1 |
|
F |
12-14 |
1 |
|
Vrgoč, 2000 |
M |
10.5-11.5 |
|
|
F |
10-11 |
|
Total Length and age data:
Total Length (TL, cm) and age (year) data
There are some distinct differences in the
growth dynamics between males and females (see tables). Females are 1 to 2
centimetres longer than males of the same age (Županović and Jardas, 1989). The growth dynamics change also through the year
Scaccini (1947b), Haidar
(1970), Relini et al. (1999).
Von Bertalanffy Growth Function (VBGF).
Parameters of the Von Bertalanffy Growth Function (VBGF).
|
Author |
Sex |
L∞(cm) |
K(yr-1) |
t0(yr) |
Φ’ |
|
Scaccini (in
Levi et. al., 1994)
|
M+F |
27.49 |
0.5 |
-0.25 |
5.93 |
|
Jukić and
Piccinetti,
1988
|
M+F |
27.0 |
1.8 |
- |
7.18 |
|
Marano, et. al. 1994;
Ungaro et al.,
1994
|
M+F |
19.70 |
0.360 |
-1.18 |
4.94 |
|
Vrgoč, 1995 (“Hvar”)
|
M+F |
27.75 |
0.274 |
-0.616 |
5.35 |
|
Marano, 1996
Marano et al., 1998b
Marano et al., 1998c
|
M |
27 |
0.184 |
-1.92 |
4.90 |
|
F |
34.5 |
0.156 |
-1.53 |
5.22 |
|
M+F |
31.5 |
0.182 |
-1.45 |
5.19 |
|
M+F (Bhatt) |
26.3 |
0.45 |
- |
5.74 |
|
Ardizzone, 1998
|
M+F |
27.50 |
0.50 |
- |
5.93 |
|
Marano et al., 1998b
Marano et al., 1998c
|
M |
22.5 |
0.24 |
-1.29 |
4.80 |
|
F |
26.2 |
0.23 |
-1.41 |
5.06 |
|
M+F |
22.5 |
0.38 |
-0.63 |
5.26 |
|
M+F( Bhatt) |
25.4 |
0.25 |
- |
5.08 |
|
M+F (Surf.) |
23 |
0.52 |
- |
5.62 |
|
Vrgoč, 2000
|
M+F |
26.86 |
0.295 |
- |
5.36 |
|
EC XIV/298/96-EN, Ionian and Southern
Adriatic
|
M+F |
21.72 |
0.31 |
- |
4.99 |
|
EC XIV/298/96-EN, Adriatic Sea
|
M+F |
27.5 |
0.50 |
- |
5.94 |
|
Joksimovic, 2005
|
M |
17.811 |
0.282 |
-3.013 |
- |
|
F |
29.131 |
0.122 |
-3.013 |
- |
|
M+F |
30.118 |
0.118 |
-3.181 |
- |
Feeding behaviour:
The red mullet is a carnivorous species. The bulk of its food is made of endo-,
meso- and epi-biontic sea organisms. Jukić (1972,
1975) found that, in the
central Adriatic channels, the Red mullet’s food consists of Polychaeta,
Lamellibranchiata and Crustacea. The same prey was described as the dominant
food of this species by Haidar (1970) and
Froglia (1988). It is also observed
that the larger specimens eat bigger prey (Froglia
1988). Jukić and Županović
(1965) showed that, in the eastern Adriatic, the red mullet eat continuously
throughout the year but more so during summer and autumn, which is probably in
relation to the water temperature.
In the Adriatic, the main fish predators of juvenile and adult red mullet are
Lophius piscatorius, Raja clavata, Trygon pastinaca, Galeus
canis, Zeus faber and Merluccius merluccius (Haidar,
1970). |
|
 |
|
EVALUATION AND EXPLOITATION |
Although the red mullet
is distributed in the entire Adriatic, the density of the population is not the
same in terms of space as well as time. For example, Arneri
and Jukić (1986) found that the biomass index between Italian and Croatian waters is about 1:4.
It was also observed that the population abundance decreased with depth (Županović and Jardas, 1989).
CPUE:
In the
period from 1989 to 1994, the CPUE was from 0,33 to 2,45 kg/h in the southern
Adriatic and from 0,96 to 1,43 kg/h in the central and eastern Adriatic (EC XIV/298/96-EN,
1996). In the period from 2002-2004 the CPUE was 5.4 kg/h and 23.10% percentage
in total catch in the open sea off Montenegrin coastal area (Joksimovic, 2005).
Biomass/Abundance
Indexes:
During the MEDITS expedition (1996-1998), the average biomass index for red
mullet in the central and northern Adriatic was 16,36 kg/km2. The highest
population density was found in the 50 to 100 m stratum (28,81 kg/km2). The
proportion of this species in the total catch of the demersal fish was 5,66% (Vrgoč, 2000). The average length value was 14,43 cm and it increased with depth.
During the “Hvar”
expedition, Red mullet made about 6,27% of the catch and was the fifth species
according to the proportion of catch. This proportion was 6,79% during the
MEDITS expedition (ranking as fourth species in the catch).
In the summer and autumn
periods, young specimens are dominant in the population. In some coastal areas
of the Western Adriatic Sea, this fraction is 60-90%, with catch rates up to 100
kg/h (Froglia, 1988). (Piccinetti and Piccinetti
Manfrin, 1994; Ungaro et al.,
1996). Individuals older than one year were always a minor part of the catch (near
5% in autumn and 20% in spring) in the surveys performed in these seasons (Relini et al., 1999).
During a survey in open
Montenegrin waters (2002-2004) the relative biomass of Mullus was 104.8 Kg/km2 (absolute
biomass 242.592 kg/km2) with a total biomass of 236.61 tonnes and an estimated
MSY of 37.62 (Joksimovic, 2005).
Mortality:
The red mullet mortality rates in the Adriatic are summarized in the table. They
show a high exploitation level of the species.
Mortality rate coefficients for red mullet in the Adriatic.
| Author |
M(yr-1) |
F(yr-1) |
Z(yr-1) |
|
Arneri
and Jukić, 1986 |
- |
- |
2.47-4.37(age0-1) |
| - |
- |
1.64 |
|
Haidar,
1970 |
- |
- |
0.64 |
|
Jukić and
Piccinetti,
1988 |
- |
- |
1.64 |
|
Piccinetti and Jukic, 1988 |
- |
- |
1.45-1.63 |
|
Marano, et. al. 1994 |
0.43 |
0.10-0.64 |
0.53-1.07 |
|
Ungaro et al.,
1994 |
0.43 |
- |
1.13-1.28 |
|
Marano, 1996 |
0.77 |
1.11
Fmax=0.6-0.85 |
1.88(1.61-2.15) |
|
Ardizzone, 1998 |
0.91 (Pauly)
0.51 (Djabali) |
F(obs)=2.60
F(0,1)=1.00 |
- |
|
GMS-GRUND, 1998 |
- |
- |
2.99 |
|
Marano et al., 1998b |
0.31 |
0.92 |
1.23(1.02-1.43) |
|
Marano et al., 1998c |
0.43-0.77 |
- |
1.2-1.9 |
|
Vrgoč, 2000 |
0.58 |
0.90 |
0.61 |
|
Joksimovic, 2005 |
0.653 (Pauly) M |
- |
- |
| 0.712 (Pauly) F |
- |
- |
| 0.662 (Pauly) M+F |
- |
- |
|
EC XIV/298/96-EN (Ionian Sea
and Southern Adriatic Sea) |
- |
F(obs)=0.65-1.28 |
- |
|
0.69 (Pauly) |
F(0,1)=0.6-1.63 |
- |
|
0.41 (Djabali) |
F(0,1)=0.36-0.65 |
- |
|
EC XIV/298/96-EN (Adriatic Sea) |
- |
F(obs)=0.91-4.09(obs) |
- |
|
0.91 (Pauly) |
F(0,1)=0.95-1.85 |
- |
|
0.51 (Djabali) |
F(0,1)=0.52-0.79 |
- |
|
|
 |
|
Gear:
In the Adriatic, red mullet is almost exclusively fished with bottom trawl
nets. Smaller quantities are fished with trammel-nets as well.
Fisheries statistics:
The total annual catch is about 2000 tonnes.

Mullus spp capture fishery production (Adriatic Sea*). Data:
FAO-FISHSTAT (GFCM
(Mediterranean and Black Sea) capture production 1970-2003 (Release date: May
2005) Regional dataset available at
ftp://ftp.fao.org/fi/stat/windows/fishplus/gfcm.zip.
*According to GFCM definition of statistical sub-areas the Adriatic Sea falls within the area
2.1, thus including only the Northern and Central basins, while the Southern
Adriatic basin and consequently the coast of South-eastern Italy and of Albania
are included in the Ionian Sea (area 2.2). In order to have as comprehensive a
picture as possible of all Adriatic Sea fishery production, Albanian data
originally classified as from the Ionian Sea have been included in the Adriatic
data set used. Unfortunately, this was not feasible for South-western Italy (Apulia
Region).
Selectivity:
The data about the selectivity of trawl to the red mullet population are
shown in table.
Selectivity of trawl
towards red mullet.
* knot to knot.
|
|
 |
|
|
Species |
Relevant genetic results |
Population biology and ecology issues |
|
Genetic diversity |
Genetic differentiation |
|
Mullus barbatus |
Number of alleles: 12-33 (mean
22.5)
Heterozigosity 60%-96% (mean 78%)
HWE fitting: 80%
The Adriatic samples showed high genetic diversity and respect of the HWE
|
Fixation indices among
Adriatic samples were generally low but in some comparison they were medium-high
and significant.
Subtle spatial genetic heterogeneity not related to a geographic cline |
The randomness of genetic
differences among samples indicated that the Adriatic red mullet stock probably
belongs to a single population unit.
However, individuals may group into local, genetically differentiated
sub-populations
Correlation between geographic distance and genetic differentiation was not
detected.
The observed genetic fragmentation in the Adriatic stock may be generated by
reproductive success, survival rates or fishing pressure. |
|
Scientific name |
Common name |
Project framework |
Sampling (Survey) |
Development of genetic marker (type &
number of markers) |
Genetic structure (analysed samples,
geographic areas) |
Population units in the Adriatic shared
stock |
Reference associated |
|
Mullus barbatus |
Red mullet |
GenPopAdr, MiPAF |
√
(MEDITS 2002) |
√
(microsatellites, 6 optimised loci) |
√
(4; NA,MA,SA) |
√
Single panmictic unit |
Final report of GenPopAdr project , MiPAF
Garoia et al. 2004b. |
|
|
 |
|
Minimum size:
|
|
 |
|
Abella, A.J., Serena, F. (1998) Stato di
sfruttamento del nasello nei compartimenti di pesca di Livorno e Viareggio.
Biol. Mar. Medit., 5(2): 136-150.
AdriaMed. (2000) Priority topics related to
shared demersal fishery resources of the Adriatic Sea. Report of the first
meeting of the AdriaMed Working Group on shared demersal resources. FAO-MiPAF
Scientific Cooperation to Support Responsible Fisheries in the Adriatic Sea. GCP/RER/010/ITA/TD-02: 21 pp.
Alegria Hernandez, V., Granić, V., Jukić, S.
(1982) The protection of the hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) in the
Adriatic Sea by regulation of the level of exploitation. Acta Adriat., 23 (1/2):
431-440.
Alegria Hernandez, V., Jukić, S. (1990) Some
aspects of biology and population dynamics of Hake (Merluccius merluccius)
from the Adriatic Sea. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer. Medit., 32 (1): 265.
Alegria Hernandez, V., Jukić, S. (1992)
Abundance dynamics of the hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) from the middle
Adriatic Sea. Bull. Inst. Oceanogr., Monaco, n. special 11: 161pp.
Alfirević, S., Crnković, D., Gamulin Brida,
H. (1969) Problem racionalne eksploatacije škampa (Nephrops norvegicus
L.). Thalassia Jugosl., 5: 5-12.
Ardizzone, G.D. (1998) Un tentativo di
valutazione delle condizioni di Merluccius merluccius e Mullus
barbatus nei mari italiani. Biol. Mar. Medit., 5(2): 151-168.
Arneri, E. (1996) Fisheries resources
assessment and management in Adriatic and Ionian Seas. FAO Fish. Rep., 533:
7-20.
Arneri, E., Jukić, S. (1986) Some preliminary
observations on the biology and dynamics of Mullus barbatus in the
Adriatic Sea. FAO Fish. Rep., 345: 79-86.
Bello, G., Marano, G., Rizzi., Jukić, S.,
Piccinetti, C. (1986) Preliminary survey on the Adriatic hake, Merluccius
merluccius, within the Demersal Resources Assessment Programme, Spring 1985
survey. FAO Fish. Rep., 345: 200-204.
Bertrand, J. (1995) Campagnes internationales
de chalutage demersal en Mediteranee (MEDITS). Campagne 1994. Manuel des protocoles. Rapp. de Contract EC-IFREMER-IEO-SIBM-NCMR (MED93: 020-018 006004):
27 pp.
Bertrand, J., Gil de Sola, L., Papaconstatinou, C., Relini, G. and Souplet, A. (1997) An international bottom
trawl survey in the Mediterranean: the MEDITS programme. ICES CM 1997-03: 16 pp.
Beverton, R.J.H. and S.J. Holt (1956) A rewiev of methods for estimating martality rates in expoited fish populations,
with special references to sources of bias in catch sampling. Rapp. P.-v. Reun.
CIEM, 140: 67-83.
Bini, G. (1968-70) Atlante dei pesci delle
coste italiane. 1-10. Mondo Sommerso Roma.
| | | |